Legal Opinion

Fleming v. Ferguson

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 6, 1946No. 36,511; No. 36,512PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Smith, J.:

These were actions to recover taxes that had been paid under protest. Judgment was for the defendants. Plaintiffs have appealed.

One action was brought by The Union Pacific Railroad Company, the other by the trustees of the estate of The Chicago, Rock Island and Pacific Railway Company. The pleadings and findings are identical except for amounts. Hereafter in this opinion the pleadings and findings with reference to The Union Pacific Railroad Company will be discussed. After identifying the parties, the petition alleged that the defendant,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United States v. HobbsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1941
  2. Columbus Water-Works Co. v. City of ColumbusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  3. Keystone Investment Co. v. Metropolitan Utilities DistrictNebraska Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Milo Water Co. v. Inhabitants of MiloSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1939
  5. Shirley v. ShirleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sinclair Pipe Line Co. v. State Commission of Revenue & TaxationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  2. Chicopee Manufacturing Corporation v. Manchester Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1951
  3. Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API