Legal Opinion

Chicopee Manufacturing Corporation v. Manchester Board of Water Commissioners

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided July 2, 1951No. 4043PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, J.

The power of a court to pass on the reasonableness of charges made by a municipal water works, when not otherwise regulated by statute, is generally recognized. Anno. 127 A. L. R. 94, 101. Whether a preliminary injunction should be granted to restrain official action alleged to be unconstitutional and discriminatory need not be determined. Tirrell v. Johnston, 86 N. H. 530, 532; Musgrove v. Parker, 84 N. H. 550. In accordance with the usual practice in this state no injunction was granted and the disputed charges were held in a separate account to await the outcome of the litigation. Studio…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gordon v. DoranSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907
  2. Gay v. Damariscotta-Newcastle Water Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1932
  3. J. W. Edgerly & Co. v. City of OttumwaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Fleming v. FergusonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1946

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. San Antonio Independent School District v. City of San AntonioTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Kliks v. Dalles CityOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Mountain Springs Water Co. v. HuberSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API