Legal Opinion

Pearce v. Shurtz

Utah Supreme Court

Decided May 4, 1954No. 7634PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McDONOUGH, Justice.

Ivan Call sold a ranch to Frank Lewel-len giving him a bond for deed and taking in return a promissory note executed by Lewellen. These items were placed in escrow. The bond for deed recited the terms of the agreement and contained a forfeiture clause effective 60 days after Lewellen’s failure to comply with certain terms. This forfeiture clause expressly provided that upon default the buyer at seller’s election became at once a tenant at will of the seller and the escrow had the right to return the bond for deed, note, abstracts, and contract to the seller. It was also…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foxley v. RichUtah Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Marquardt v. FisherOregon Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Christy Et Ux. v. Guild Et Ux.Utah Supreme Court · 1942

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Themy v. Seagull Enterprises, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Strand v. MayneUtah Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Lyman Grazing Association v. SmithUtah Supreme Court · 1970
  4. Evershed v. BerryUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  5. Evershed v. BerryUtah Supreme Court · 1968

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API