Legal Opinion
Evershed v. Berry
Utah Supreme Court
Decided January 15, 1968No. 10889Published
1Opinion of the Court
20 Utah 2d 203 (1968)
436 P.2d 438
ORVILLE EVERSHED AND EARL HEMMERT, PLAINTIFFS AND RESPONDENTS,
v.
JOY R. BERRY ET AL., DEFENDANTS, AND PHILLIP CONLEY DBA HICKORY PIT, DEFENDANT AND APPELLANTS.
No. 10889.
Supreme Court of Utah.
January 15, 1968.
Henry Nygaard, Beaslin, Nygaard, Coke & Vincent, Salt Lake City, for appellants.
Howard N. Jones, Biele, Jones & Murphy, Salt Lake City, for respondents.
CALLISTER, Justice.
This appeal involves the validity of a five-year written lease between a contract purchaser, Berry, as a lessor and his lessee, Conley, after the lessor's interest has been terminated by…
Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.
2Cases cited5 opinions
- In Re the Accounting of O'DonnellNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Utah Savings and Loan Association v. MechamUtah Supreme Court · 1961
- Pearce v. ShurtzUtah Supreme Court · 1954
- Geo. Benz & Sons v. WillarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1936
- Evershed v. BerryUtah Supreme Court · 1968