Legal Opinion

Thermalloy Inc. v. Aavid Engineering, Inc.

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided August 15, 1996No. Civil No. 93-16-JDPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

DiCLERICO, Chief Judge.

By memorandum order of March 15, 1996, the court granted defendant Aavid Engineering, Inc.’s motion for summary judgment on the ground that plaintiff Thermalloy Inc.’s patent, Letters Patent No. 4,884,331, Method for Manufacturing Heat Sink Apparatus *64(“the ’331 patent”), was invalid. Thermalloy Inc. v. Aavid Engineering, Inc., 935 F.Supp. 55 (D.N.H.1996). The court denied Aavid’s request for attorney fees under 35 U.S.C. § 285 and, finding that the order resolved the dispute pending between the parties, the clerk was ordered to close the case. Id. at 62. Final…

2Cases cited12 opinions

Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
California Motor Transport Co. v. Trucking UnlimitedSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
Professional Real Estate Investors, Inc. v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
Allied Tube & Conduit Corp. v. Indian Head, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

Gleason Works v. Oerlikon Geartec, AGDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2001