Legal Opinion

Bargler v. Farmers Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided June 30, 1930No. 12,634PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

These parties occupy the same relative position here as in the trial court and for convenience we designate them as there.

Plaintiff, claiming to be the owner of five shares of stock in defendant corporation, as evidenced by certificate No. 172 which he held, brought this action in mandamus to compel a transfer thereof to him on the books of the company. Defendant’s motion for judgment on the pleadings was sustained on the ground that title to the stock in question was in dispute. To review that judgment plaintiff brings error, asks that the writ be made a supersedeas, and prays final judgment…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sturner v. James A. McCandless Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Foley v. StapletonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1936
  2. Hertz Drive-Ur-Self System v. DoakSupreme Court of Colorado · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API