Legal Opinion

People Ex Rel. Foley v. Stapleton

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided March 9, 1936No. 13,563PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Burke

Plaintiffs in error are hereinafter referred to as Foley, defendants in error as the city, and the Denver Tramway Corporation as the tramway.

The city, by ordinance, granted the tramway a “revocable permit” to operate passenger busses on Marion street. Foley brought mandamus to compel the cancellation thereof. The city demurred for want of facts, defect of parties, and want of jurisdiction. The ruling of the court was, “The demurrer of respondents to the alternative writ of mandamus is sustained.” Foley elected to stand and to review the judgment thereupon entered against him he prosecutes…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Greenwood Cemetery Land Co. v. RouttSupreme Court of Colorado · 1892
  2. Denver & Swansea Railway Co. v. Denver City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1875
  3. Sturner v. James A. McCandless Investment Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930
  4. Bargler v. Farmers Irrigation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1930

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Adams v. BolinArizona Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Ahern v. BakerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Rocky Mountain Motor Co. v. Airport Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  4. U S West Communications, Inc. v. City of LongmontColorado Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Hall v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API