Legal Opinion

Lucey Boiler & Manufacturing Corp. v. Hicks

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided July 2, 1949PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice TomlotsON

delivered the' opinion of the Court.

Arthur Hicks died during the course of his employment by Lucey Boiler & Manufacturing Corporation. The trial court found that his death arose out of his employ*702ment and awarded Ms widow, Mattie Hicks, tire amount required by the Workmen’s Compensation Act. Code, Section 6851 et seq. Tbe employer bas appealed, and insists that there is no evidence to support this finding.

As recognized by plaintiff in error, in workmen’s compensation cases findings of the lower court supported by any material evidence will not be disturbed on appeal. The testimony is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Volz Const. Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Sanders v. Blue Ridge Glass Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Riverside Mill Co. v. ParsonsTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Tennessee Eastman Corp. v. RussellTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Lee v. Aluminum Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1947

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Coleman v. CokerTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Rogers v. ShawTennessee Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Lunsford v. A. C. Lawrence Leather Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1949
  4. Howell v. Charles H. Bacon Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1951
  5. Lawrence County Highway Department v. HardimanTennessee Supreme Court · 1975

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API