Legal Opinion
Bloom v. Martin
District Court, N.D. California
Decided July 22, 1994No. C 94-0784 SBAPublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS
ARMSTRONG, District Judge.
Plaintiffs filed the instant class action against various mortgage lenders and individuals alleging that they have wrongfully withheld disclosing certain real estate fees. The First Amended Complaint alleges claims under the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act of 1974 (“RESPA”), 12 U.S.C. §§ 2601-2617, and various state law causes of action. The parties are presently before the Court on defendants’ motion to dismiss. 1 After having read and considered the papers submitted, and being fully informed, the Court grants…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Touche Ross & Co. v. RedingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Rosal v. First Federal Bank of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2009
- Davenport v. Litton Loan Servicing, LPDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2010
- McAnaney v. Astoria Financial Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 2005
- Lake v. First Nationwide BankDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
- Lingad v. Indymac Federal BankDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2010
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.