Legal Opinion

State v. Tolefree

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided March 12, 1997No. 96-0786-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, P.J.

Dexter Tolefree appeals pro se from judgments of conviction finding him guilty of delivery of cocaine, and obstructing an officer, both as a repeater. With the assistance of counsel, Tolefree filed a timely motion for postconviction relief. See § 974.02, Stats.; see also § 809.30, Stats., 1993-94. Now, acting pro se, he seeks review of the following claims: that the penalty enhancement was illegal because § 973.12(1), STATS., was not followed; that his arraignment was improper because he was not personally handed a copy of the information, which he claims resulted in a loss of subject matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. HoltCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1985
  3. Minuteman, Inc. v. AlexanderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. FlowersCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1998
  2. State v. KletzienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011
  3. State Ex Rel. Krieger v. BorgenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2004
  4. Griffin v. McCaughtryDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. BensonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2018

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API