State v. Kletzien
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the CourtCurley, P.J.
¶ 1. Terry L. Kletzien, Jr., appeals the judgment convicting him of several felonies and the order denying his second postconviction motion. Kletzien contends that the well-established rule, articulated in State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), requiring criminal defendants to consolidate their postconviction claims into a single appeal absent a "sufficient reason," does not apply to motions for postconviction discovery. Consequently, Kletzien argues, because his first postconviction motion was in fact a postconviction discovery motion, he was not required to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
- State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
- State v. TolefreeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
- State v. ZienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- Cristian M. Loga-Negru v. Robert MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- Hill v. BuesgenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
- Kevin S. Maas v. Daisy ChaseDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
- State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.