Legal Opinion

State v. Kletzien

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided January 19, 2011No. 2010AP296PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurley, P.J.

¶ 1. Terry L. Kletzien, Jr., appeals the judgment convicting him of several felonies and the order denying his second postconviction motion. Kletzien contends that the well-established rule, articulated in State v. Escalona-Naranjo, 185 Wis. 2d 168, 185, 517 N.W.2d 157 (1994), requiring criminal defendants to consolidate their postconviction claims into a single appeal absent a "sufficient reason," does not apply to motions for postconviction discovery. Consequently, Kletzien argues, because his first postconviction motion was in fact a postconviction discovery motion, he was not required to…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. Escalona-NaranjoWisconsin Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. LoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  3. State v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. State v. TolefreeCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. State v. ZienCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2008

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Cristian M. Loga-Negru v. Robert MillerDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  3. Hill v. BuesgenDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2023
  4. Kevin S. Maas v. Daisy ChaseDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2026
  5. State v. Andres Romero-GeorganaWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API