Legal Opinion

Matter of Sanger v. Greene

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 19, 1935PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHubbs, J.

Prior to July 1, 1934, petitioners were employed in the State Department of Public Works, Division of Architecture, as senior architects, grade 7. At the same time three other men were also employed in the same division as senior architects, grade 7. The Legislature, in the appropriation bill for the year 1934-1935, cut the appropriation for the Division of Architecture, and certain senior architects, petitioners included, were suspended. They bring this proceeding to compel reinstatement as of July 1, 1934, asserting that they possess seniority rights over the three architects referred to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Thoma v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Matter of Albert v. Board of Educ. of the City of N.Y.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  3. Shepherd v. GreeneNew York Supreme Court · 1934

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Corrigan v. JosephNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  2. Wood v. IrvingNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  3. Mandle v. BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1958
  4. Crow v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  5. Detective Endowment Ass'n v. LearyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1971

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API