Legal Opinion

Tracy v. Palmentto Fire Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 14, 1928PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWagner, J.

— On a policy of fire insurance issued by the defendant the Palmetto Fire Insurance Company, the plaintiff in this action seeks to recover for damage to his automobile, alleged to have been caused by fire. By the terms of the policy, the automobile is insured against direct loss or damage from fire, arising from any cause whatsoever. The liability of the defendant the Automobile Insurance Company is by reason of having reinsured the risks of the former company. It is the contention of the defendants that the loss or damage caused by the fire is only the sum of $132, and that the remainder of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  2. Lynn Gas & Electric Co. v. Meriden Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1893
  3. Ermentrout v. Girard Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1895
  4. Newmark v. Liverpool & London Fire & Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1860
  5. Russell v. German Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Denham v. La Salle-Madison Hotel Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1948
  2. Unkelsbee v. Homestead Fire Insurance Co. of BaltimoreDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
  3. Fogarty v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1935
  4. Clouse v. Saint Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1950
  5. Delametter v. the Home Ins. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API