Legal Opinion

Stearman v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided January 19, 2006No. 05-60521PublishedCited by 46 opinions

1Per curiam

William Stearman, III, pro se, appeals the judgment of the United States Tax Court dismissing his two consolidated cases for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute and sanctioning him $12,500 per case under 26 U.S.C. § 6673 for advancing frivolous positions and maintaining the proceedings primarily for delay. 1 Stearman also requests damages under § 6673 against the Tax Court judge and opposing counsel in an amount “at least equal to the amount of the ‘judgment.’ ” We affirm and grant the Commissioner’s motion to impose sanctions for maintaining a frivolous appeal.

I

We review de…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Little v. Liquid Air Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  2. Hutto v. FinneySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Sam ROGERS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KROGER COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Tello v. CIRCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2005
  5. Coghlan v. StarkeyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by46 opinions

  1. Jernard Griggs v. S.G.E. Management, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Petro Harvester Operating Comp v. David KeiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
  3. Taylor Pipeline Construction, Inc. v. Directional Road Boring, Inc.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Watson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
  5. Thanedar v. Time Warner, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009

41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API