Legal Opinion
Thanedar v. Time Warner, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided November 3, 2009No. 08-20734UnpublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM: *
Plaintiff-Appellant Chandrashekhar B. Thanedar appeals the district court’s entry of judgment pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 50 and 52 on his claims for whistleblower retaliation in violation of Section 806 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, 18 U.S.C. § 1514A, breach of contract, and violations of the Texas Payday Law, Tex. Lab.Code Ann. § 61.001 et seq. (Vernon 2006). For the reasons stated below, we affirm.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
From 2000 to 2004, Time Warner Cable-Houston Division (TWC-Houston) employed Thanedar as its Director of Finance. At the time of Thanedar’s…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Lewis v. Continental Bank Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Stoll v. GottliebSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Edward M. Farguson v. Mbank Houston, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1986
- Nevada v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont Corporation, Mauricio A. Leon, M.D. v. Idx Systems Corporation, a Vermont CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Long v. GSDMIdea City, L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
- Ambrea Fairchild v. All Amer Check Cashing, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2016
- Charles Lee v. Norfolk Southern Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- Anthony G. Petrello v. Matthew W. Prucka, Sheryl S. Prucka, Rahul Nath and Usha Nath, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2013
- Janet K. Sanford v. Walter DudleyCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.