Legal Opinion

Frost v. Penfold

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided August 1, 1927No. 4684PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is a suit to enjoin the defendants, appellants here, from cutting the bank of a certain irrigation ditch situate in part upon appellant Penfold's land, and from interfering with respondents' use of the same. Although the complaint prays that the water flowing from the East Waddington spring in said ditch be decreed to plaintiffs, this is not an action to determine priorities or to adjudicate water rights.

In 1887, John Waddington, predecessor in interest of respondents, developed a blind spring upon the lands now owned and occupied by appellant Penfold, and constructed a ditch from said…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Rabido v. FureyIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
  2. MacRae v. SmallOregon Supreme Court · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation District v. MussellIdaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Gilbert v. SmithIdaho Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Almo Water Company v. DarringtonIdaho Supreme Court · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API