Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Watson v. Hamilton County Board of Elections

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2000No. 00-249PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Per curiam

Watson asserts that he is entitled to a writ of mandamus to compel the board to certify his candidacy for Hamilton County Sheriff on the March 7 primary election ballot. We will set aside the board’s decision to uphold the protest and issue the requested writ of mandamus if Watson establishes that the board’s decision resulted from fraud, corruption, abuse of discretion, or clear disregard of applicable law. State ex rel. O'Beirne v. Geauga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1997), 80 Ohio St.3d 176, 179, 685 N.E.2d 502, 504-505.

Watson initially claims that by upholding the protest, the board abused its…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Burdick v. TakushiSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. Timmons v. Twin Cities Area New PartySupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Fabrey v. McDonald Village Police DepartmentOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Desenco, Inc. v. City of AkronOhio Supreme Court · 1999

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. United Automobile, Aerospace & Agricultural Implement Workers of America v. Ohio Bureau of Workers' CompensationOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Wellington v. Mahoning County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Brown v. Ashtabula Cty. Bd. of Elections (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2014
  4. State ex rel. Canales-Flores v. Lucas County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State ex rel. Craig v. Scioto County Board of ElectionsOhio Supreme Court · 2008

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API