In the Interest of K.R.M.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by
PAUL W. GREEN, Justice.
Following the trial court’s order terminating his parental rights to the children, K.M.R., Jr., and T.M., appellant Kevin Martin filed a motion for new trial and statement of appellate points. The trial court denied the motion for new trial and ruled that appellant’s points for appeal were frivolous. In four issues, Martin appeals the trial court’s decision to deny the motion for new trial. See Tex. Fam.Code Ann. § 263.405(g) (Vernon 2002). We affirm the order of the trial court.
Background
Following a jury trial, the trial court entered its termination…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002
- Texas Department of Human Services v. BoydTexas Supreme Court · 1987
- in the Interest of J.J.O., Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2004
- In the Interest of H.R.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2002
3Cited by29 opinions
- In the Interest of H.R.M.Texas Supreme Court · 2006
- In the Interest of R.S.-T.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- In the Interest of S.J.R.-Z.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2017
- Daniel Remsburg v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2007
- In Re HRMTexas Supreme Court · 2006
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.