People v. Lichtenstein
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
ROVIRA, Justice.
This original proceeding was commenced after the respondent district court denied a motion by the People to dismiss one of three counts against the defendant, Scott D. Ferguson. The People then filed a petition for relief in the nature of prohibition and for an immediate stay of proceedings, asking this court to reverse the district court’s denial of dismissal. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.
The defendant was charged by information with three crimes. Count one was assault in the first degree, 1 a class 3 felony; count two was menacing, 2 a class…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
- People v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
- United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neckwear Con. Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
- Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
- People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Brewster v. District Court of the Seventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
- People v. FergusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.