Legal Opinion

People v. Lichtenstein

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided April 20, 1981No. 80SA564PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROVIRA, Justice.

This original proceeding was commenced after the respondent district court denied a motion by the People to dismiss one of three counts against the defendant, Scott D. Ferguson. The People then filed a petition for relief in the nature of prohibition and for an immediate stay of proceedings, asking this court to reverse the district court’s denial of dismissal. We issued a rule to show cause and now make the rule absolute.

The defendant was charged by information with three crimes. Count one was assault in the first degree, 1 a class 3 felony; count two was menacing, 2 a class…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  2. United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
  3. People v. JamesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1972
  4. People v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Colorado · 1969
  5. United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neckwear Con. Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1964

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. ZapotockySupreme Court of Colorado · 1994
  2. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1982
  3. People v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  4. Brewster v. District Court of the Seventh Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1991
  5. People v. FergusonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API