Legal Opinion
United States v. Greater Blouse, Skirt & Neckwear Con. Ass'n
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided April 13, 1964PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EDWARD WEINFELD, District Judge.
This is a motion by the Attorney General pursuant to Rule 48(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 1 ****for leave to file a dismissal of the above indictment as to all defendants. The indictment was returned by a grand jury in March 1959, charging violations of sections 1 and 2 of the Sherman Act 2 in the production of ladies’ blouses in a four-state area, principally in New York and Pennsylvania. The defendants include a manufacturer’s association, referred to hereafter as “National”; two contractors’ associations, referred to hereafter as “Slate…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Costello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Chemical Foundation, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Allen Bradley Co. v. Local Union No. 3, International Brotherhood of Electrical WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Parr v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Hoskins v. MaricleKentucky Supreme Court · 2004
- In Re United States of America, United States of America v. Ray Cowan and Jack Jacobsen, Wayne O. Woodruff, Special ProsecutorsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Robert Louis Ammidown, United States of America v. Robert L. AmmidownCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1974
- Billis v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1990
- United States v. WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.