People v. Jones
Supreme Court of Colorado
1Opinion of the Court
HODGES, Chief Justice.
In this original proceeding, we issued a rule to show cause why an order of the respondent district court dismissing criminal charges pending against defendant Ferguson should not be reversed. In our view, the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the order dismissing the pending charges. We therefore made the rule absolute.
Defendant Ferguson was charged by information with first-degree assault, 1 menacing, 2 and crime of violence, 3 all arising from the same criminal transaction. Defendant entered a plea of not guilty by reason of insanity, and sought to waive a jury…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Brooke v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
- Reliford v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1978
- People v. LichtensteinSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
- Weeks v. EschColorado Court of Appeals · 1977
- William F. Larrick, Inc. v. Burt Chevrolet, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1961
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Rathke v. MacFarlaneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- People v. DillonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- Horton v. SuthersSupreme Court of Colorado · 2002
- People v. BossertSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Molitor v. AndersonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.