Legal Opinion
Finne v. Dain Bosworth Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided November 13, 1986No. Civ. 4-86-399PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on defendants’ motions to dismiss, for partial summary judgment, for a more definite statement and for a stay of proceedings pending arbitration. Defendants’ motions will be granted in part and denied in part. FACTS
Plaintiff Wayne Finne (Finne) is a resident of Olmsted County, Minnesota. Defendant Dain Bosworth Inc. (Dain) is a broker-dealer corporation engaged in the sale of securities. Defendants Thomas Ranfranz (Ranfranz) and Michael Maher (Maher) are or were employees of Dain in its Rochester, Minnesota branch.
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Reed v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1988
- First Presbyterian Church of Mankato v. John G. Kinnard & Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Bormann v. Applied Vision Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1992