Legal Opinion
Bormann v. Applied Vision Systems, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided February 28, 1992No. Civ. 4-90-680PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSENBAUM, District Judge.
Plaintiffs seek a return of funds lost, and damages they claim to have incurred, as a result of their purchase of securities offered by defendant Applied Vision Systems, Inc. (AVSI). Plaintiffs commenced this twenty-two count lawsuit on August 30, 1990. They claim violations of the Securities Act of 1933, 15 U.S.C. § 77a et seq. (the 1933 Act); the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C. § 78a et seq. (the 1934 Act); the Minnesota Securities Act, Minn.Stat. § 80A.01 et seq.; the North Dakota Securities Act, N.D.Cent.Code § 10-04-01, et seq.; and the South…
2Cases cited41 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Abbott v. Equity Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
- In Re TMJ Implants Products Liability LitigationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Arst v. Stifel Nicolaus & Co., Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1994
- In Re First American Center Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- Gomez v. Huntington Trust Co., NADistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2000
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.