Legal Opinion
USA Rookwood Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals
Decided September 26, 1989No. Nos. 6-39, C-2-83-0293PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESLEY E. BROWN, Judge.
This case arises under Section 210 of the Economic Stabilization Act of 1970, 12 U.S.C. Sec. 1904 note. Plaintiff-Appellant Rookwood appeals a judgment entered in favor of the Atlantic Richfield Company (“ARCO”). Rookwood’s complaint alleged that ARCO overcharged two firms owned by Rookwood, Houston Oil Company (“HOC”) and Oil Transit, Inc. (“OTI”), on sales of motor gasoline from 1977 to 1981. In a series of orders, the district court granted summary judgment on the five claims alleged in Rookwood’s complaint. The district court found that four of the claims were…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Maylon B. Clinkscales T/a Clinkscales Oil Company v. Chevron U.S.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1987
- Davidson v. KeenanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
- Mobil Oil Corp. v. Department of EnergyTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1979
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Goldstein v. Time Warner New York City Cable GroupDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- International Drilling & Energy Corp. v. WatkinsTemporary Emergency Court of Appeals · 1990