Legal Opinion
Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. United States
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania
Decided March 14, 1910No. 42PublishedCited by 10 opinions
On Application for Review of a Decision of the Board of. United States General Appraisers.
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, District Judge.
Section 345 of the Revised Statutes ■(U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 135) provides:
“The Assistant Secretaries of the Treasury shall * * * perform such * * * duties in the office of the Secretary of the Treasury as may be prescribed by the Secretary or by law.”
By section 161, Rev. St. (U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 80):
“The head of each department is authorized to prescribe regulations not inconsistent with the law for the distribution and performance of its business,” and “in case of the death, resignation, absence or sickness of the head of any department, the first or sole…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Cramer v. ArthurSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
- United States v. KlingenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- The United States v. Vowell and M'cleanSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- V. Mueller & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
- Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
- Ferguson v. Port Huron & Sarnia Ferry Co.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1926
- Marco Importing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1941
- Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.