Legal Opinion

V. Mueller & Co. v. United States

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided November 8, 1940No. Customs Appeal 4299PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Presiding Judge.

This is an appeal from the judgment of the Uijited States Customs Court, Third Division, overruling the protest of the importer whereby recovery is sought of certain moneys (specifically $108.11) assessed a!nd collected by the Collector of Customs at the port of Chicago, Illinois, as countervailing duty, provided for in section 303 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C.A. § 1303, upon certain merchandise described as surgical instruments imported from Germany and entered for consumption (entry No. 2933) in the latter part of September 1936.

Another case in which recovery…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. KlingenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  2. Downs v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  3. Hadden v. MerrittSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Downs v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1902
  5. Franklin Sugar Refining Co. v. United StatesU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1910

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. The United States (Ralph Valls, Party-In-Interest) v. Hammond Lead Products, Inc.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1971
  2. Cementos Anahuac Del Golfo, S.A. v. United StatesUnited States Court of International Trade · 1988
  3. F. W. Woolworth Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940
  4. Energetic Worsted Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1963
  5. Johnston-Clark Appraisal Co. v. State, Department of RevenueSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API