Legal Opinion

State v. McBean

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided August 13, 2003No. CR00-0853; A114385PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSchuman, J.

Defendant was convicted of reckless burning, ORS 164.335, and appeals, contending that there was insufficient evidence to establish his guilt. We review the sufficiency of the evidence to support a conviction to determine whether “any rational trier of fact could have found the essential elements of the crime beyond a reasonable doubt.” State v. King, 307 Or 332, 339, 768 P2d 391 (1989). We resolve all evidentiary conflicts in the state’s favor and give the state the benefit of all reasonable inferences. State v. Krummacher, 269 Or 125, 137, 523 P2d 1009 (1974). We reverse.

The facts,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
  2. State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  3. State v. CervantesOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. RoseOregon Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Peterson v. Standard Oil Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. BranchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  2. State v. SchlenderCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
  3. State v. K.-M. D. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
  4. State v. K.-M. D. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API