State v. Schlender
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
DEITS, J. pro tempore
Defendant appeals a judgment of conviction for second-degree manslaughter, ORS 163.125. He argues that the trial court erred in denying his motion for a judgment of acquittal, because the state introduced insufficient evidence that he acted recklessly. We review the trial court’s ruling for errors of law, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state to determine whether any rational trier of fact could have found beyond a reasonable doubt that defendant acted recklessly. State v. King, 307 Or 332, 339, 768 P2d 391 (1989). We affirm.
In an attempt to take…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- State v. KrummacherOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. KingOregon Supreme Court · 1989
- State v. WaltersOregon Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. PetersenOregon Supreme Court · 1974
- State v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Morehouse v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. StuartCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. K.-M. D. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
- Morehouse v. HaynesCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
- State v. K.-M. D. C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025