Legal Opinion

Boscus v. Waldmann

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 14, 1916No. Civ. No. 1426PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

This is an action of foreclosure under the mechanic’s lien law.

On the eleventh day of April, 1912, the appellants, the Waldmanns, and the defendant, Marcuse, entered into an agreement in writing whereby the latter agreed to erect upon certain real property of the first named parties, situated in the city of San Francisco, a three-story frame 'building for the sum of $18,915, which sum was to be paid in certain specified installments at specified times, the last installment ($4,728.75) 'being made payable thirty-five days after the completion of said building. Said contract was filed for…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Roystone Co. v. DarlingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kerckhoff-Cuzner Mill & Lumber Co. v. OlmsteadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Cohn v. WrightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Meyer v. City Street Improvement Co.California Supreme Court · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Childs v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  2. Mott v. WrightCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  3. Gary C. Tanko Well Drilling, Inc. v. DoddsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  4. Irwin v. SilvaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  5. Walker ex rel. Walker v. BurkhamNevada Supreme Court · 1950

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API