Lucas v. Medical Arts Building Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Julius J. Olson, Justice.
Plaintiff appeals from an order sustaining the corporate defendant’s separate demurrer to his complaint. Hereafter we shall refer to that defendant as the “company” and to the individual defendant as “Yeates.”
Plaintiff’s cause has for its foundation a written contract entered into by the defendants on July 17, 1928. Under its terms Yeates was designated as “employe,” the company as “employer.” Yeates agreed “to look after the renting, and such details as the employer may call upon him to perform in connection with the maintenance of the present Yeates Building * * ®…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Local Loan Co. v. HuntSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Taylor v. BenhamSupreme Court of the United States · 1847
- Canty v. LatternerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
- Fay v. Bankers Surety Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1914
- Brown v. Maplewood Cemetery Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Jablonski v. Mutual Service Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc. v. NewtonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2002
- Nostdal v. County of WatonwanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1946
- Hutton v. BosigerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985