Legal Opinion

United States v. Cuevas-Ceja

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided May 14, 1999No. CR-98-60147-AAPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

AIKEN, District Judge.

Defendant Cuevas seeks suppression of all evidence and statements obtained as the result of a bus encounter initiated by law enforcement officers and the subsequent search of defendant’s baggage. Cuevas claims that the bus encounter constituted an unlawful seizure under the Fourth Amendment, and therefore any evidence obtained as a result of the bus encounter must be suppressed as fruit of the illegal seizure.

The government objects to Cuevas’s motion, claiming that the bus encounter was consensual and law enforcement officers obtained voluntary consent…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  5. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. McNealNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Commonwealth v. PoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  3. Commonwealth v. PoloSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. State v. BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. State v. BartelsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API