Legal Opinion
State v. McNeal
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 19, 2007No. 26,158PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} This matter comes before the Court on the State’s interlocutory appeal from an order granting in part Defendant Edward McNeal’s motion to suppress statements and physical evidence. See NMSA 1978, § 39-3-3(B)(2) (1972) (permitting the State to take an interlocutory appeal from an order granting a defendant’s motion to suppress). In the district court, Defendant moved to suppress three types of evidence relevant to this appeal: (1) a duffel bag and its contents, (2) a shaving kit and its contents, and (3) statements he and his daughter made to the police. The…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Florida v. RoyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. MuñozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MunozNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008
- State v. MoranNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2008