Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Polo

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 2, 2000Published

1Opinion of the Court

759 A.2d 372 (2000)

COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellant,

v.

Belisario POLO, Appellee.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.

Argued April 29, 1998.

Decided October 2, 2000.

Mark Pazuhanich, Dist. Atty., E. David Christine, Stroudsburg, for Com.

Robert Rosenblum, Stroudsburg, for Belisario Polo.

Before FLAHERTY, C.J., and ZAPPALA, CAPPY, CASTILLE, NIGRO, NEWMAN and SAYLOR, JJ.

OPINION

ZAPPALA, Justice.

This case presents the issue of whether the Pennsylvania Constitution prohibits the random stopping of a vehicle to conduct a drug interdiction investigation in the absence of reasonable suspicion or probable…

Also in this document: Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Whren v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Ohio v. RobinetteSupreme Court of the United States · 1996

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API