Legal Opinion

Bloodworth v. Continental Insurance Company

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided September 20, 1979No. 57696PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Smith, Judge.

We reverse the judgment of the trial court affirming the denial of appellant’s claim by the State Board of Workers’ Compensation.

1. Code § 114-105 provides: "No compensation shall be allowed for an injury . . . due to the employee’s wilful misconduct ... or due to intoxication ...” Under this section, the fact of wilful misconduct or intoxication alone will not suffice to bar recovery by the employee. "Wilful misconduct or intoxication of an employee which would bar a recovery for injuries sustained by him must be such wilful misconduct or intoxication as proximately caused the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fried v. United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  2. Parks v. Maryland Casualty Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1943
  3. Davis v. Houston General InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Roy v. NormanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1991
  2. Terry v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  3. Communications, Inc. v. CannonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1985
  4. Southwire Co. v. CatoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  5. Southwire Co. v. CatoSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API