Roy v. Norman
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Smith, Presiding Justice.
We granted a petition for Writ of Certiorari in this Workers’ Compensation case to answer the question: “Whether the employee’s conduct constituted wilful misconduct within the meaning of OCGA § 34-9-17.” The appellant, Milton Roy, claims that he has no liability to the appellee-employee, Leonard C. Norman, because OCGA § 34-9-17 provides for denial of Workers’ Compensation benefits where the injury is due to wilful misconduct. We find no wilful misconduct on the part of Mr. Norman and we affirm.
At the time of the incident in question, Mr. Roy operated a retail tire…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ætna Life Insurance v. CarrollSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
- Bloodworth v. Continental Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
- Terry v. Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wilbro v. MossmanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Burdette v. Chandler Telecom, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Martines v. Worley & Sons ConstructionCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
- ATC Healthcare Service, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- ATC Healthcare Service, Inc. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.