Legal Opinion
Greeson v. Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 18, 1992No. Nos. WD44159, WD44175PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ULRICH, Judge.
Ace Pipe Cleaning, Inc., (Ace) appeals from that portion of the judgment awarding $60,000, entered in behalf of Sammie and Ruby Jean Greeson, husband and wife, following the adverse $60,000 jury verdict assessed for waste pursuant to § 537.420, RSMo 1986. Ace does not appeal that portion of the judgment awarding $20 to the Greesons for breach of contract. Ace contends that (1) the jury improperly awarded damages for depreciation in value to land not leased by Ace, (2) insufficient evidence was presented establishing the occurrence of waste, (3) the statute of limitations…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Ortmeyer v. BruemmerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Lustig v. U. M. C. Industries, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1982
- Klippel v. WatkinsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1984
- Mosher v. Levering Investments, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
- Bussell v. LeatMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Owen v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Brizendine v. ConradSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
- Carpenter v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2008
- State ex rel. Boyer v. PerigoMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998
- Timothy Owen v. General Motors CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008