Bartmess v. Holliday
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Tippecanoe Circuit Court; W. D. Wallace, Judge. Action by Sarah Holliday against William F. Bartmess and others to review a judgjment. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendants appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBlack, C. J.
— The appellee, Sarah Holliday, brought her proceeding in the co-urt- below to review a judgment of that court, and obtained a modification of that judgment. William F. Bartmess, William Y. Stuárt, and George B. King appealed to the Supreme Court, from which the cause was transferred to this court.
The facts shown by the appellee’s amended complaint with her supplemental complaint, so far as they need be stated here, were substantially as follows: On and prior *546to September 19, 1896, the appellee was, and she still is, a married woman, wife of Eli Holliday. On the 14th of December, 1898, James…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McFadden v. RossIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Shoemaker v. Board of CommissionersIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
- Hanes v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1900
- Jones v. VertIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
- Finley v. CathcartIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Christ v. JovanoffIndiana Court of Appeals · 1926
- Franklin v. HuntIndiana Court of Appeals · 1961
- Darby v. VinnedgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Price v. State ex rel. GordonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1918
- Acme-Goodrich, Inc. v. NEAL, ETC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1959
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.