Legal Opinion

Nies v. National Automobile & Casualty Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 29, 1988No. B023334PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

FUKUTO, J.

Introduction

Following a jury trial, judgment was entered for plaintiff, Michael Nies, Sr., against National Automobile and Casualty Insurance Company (National) and Charles J. Morris (Morris), Vice President and General Claims Manager for National (collectively, defendants). The jury found that National had breached its covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and that National and Morris had breached their duties under Insurance Code section 790.03, subdivision (h) and acted in conscious disregard of plaintiff’s rights. Plaintiff was awarded $35,000 in general damages and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. White v. Western Title InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. MrozekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Palmer v. Farmers Insurance ExchangeMontana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Knotts v. Zurich Insurance Co.Kentucky Supreme Court · 2006
  4. California Physicians' Service v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Old Republic Insurance v. FSR Brokerage, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API