Ellerbe v. Tuscan Highlands LLC
District Court, D. Nevada
1Opinion
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 * * * 5 Sydney Ellerbe, Case No. 2:24-cv-00554-APG-DJA 6 Plaintiff, 7 Order v. 8 Tuscan Highlands, LLC; Schulman Properties; 9 and Winnie Schulman, 10 Defendants. 11 12 Before the Court is pro se Plaintiff Sydney Ellerbe’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 9). 13 Plaintiff is proceeding in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, so the Court screens his 14 amended complaint. The Court dismisses certain of Plaintiff’s claims and allows others to 15 proceed and orders service of Plaintiff’s amended complaint. 16 I. Legal standard for screening.…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.