Richard Lee Worthan v. Donald Wyrick
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
LAY, Chief Judge.
This is a habeas corpus case brought by Richard Worthan, a Missouri state prisoner. Worthan claimed that illegally seized evidence and improper “bystander jurors” were used in his trial, that his counsel was ineffective, and that he was subjected to double jeopardy. Initially, the magistrate recommended that the writ be denied in all but one respect; he required an evidentiary hearing on the jury issue to determine whether “cause” existed to excuse the lack of a contemporaneous objection to the jury by his then-appointed counsel. Following an evidentiary hearing on this…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Murray v. CarrierSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Wainwright v. SykesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Reed v. RossSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- United States v. Charles L. McDaniel A/K/A "Black Danny" (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- John Dale Henson v. Donald Wyrick, Warden, Missouri State PenitentiaryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hulsey v. SargentCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
- Byrd v. ArmontroutDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1988
- McDonald v. DeloDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1995
- Dewayne Hulsey v. Willis Sargent, Superintendent, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of Correction, Dewayne Hulsey v. Willis Sargent, Superintendent, Cummins Unit, Arkansas Department of CorrectionCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987