Legal Opinion
Glover v. Parole Board
Michigan Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1999No. 111221, Calendar No. 12PublishedCited by 65 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBrickley, J.
We granted leave to appeal in this case to review the propriety of the Court of Appeals holdings that (1) an individual serving a parolable life sen*513tence has a federal and state due process right to a written explanation of why parole was denied, and (2) the parole board is subject to the Open Meetings Act.1
Although we reverse the Court of Appeals holding regarding the due process and oma questions, we affirm the remand to the parole board for a more detailed written explanation on the basis of MCL 791.235(12); MSA 28.2305(12).
FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW
On January 19, 1976, then…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Sandin v. ConnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal & Correctional ComplexSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Cooper v. AaronSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- James Anthony Sweeton v. Robert Brown, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by65 opinions
- Crump v. LaflerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- People v. CunninghamMichigan Supreme Court · 2014
- In re Parole of EliasMichigan Court of Appeals · 2011
- Kola Hasanaj v. Detroit Pub. Schs. Cmty. Dist.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2022
- In re Parole of HillMichigan Court of Appeals · 2012
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.