Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Harbison

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 8, 1961Published

1Opinion of the CourtMooee, J.

G.S.28-112 provides that “If a claim is presented to and rejected by the . . . administrator . . . , the claimant must, within six months, after due notice in writing of such rejection . . . commence an action for recovery thereof, or be forever barred from maintaining an action thereon.”

The purpose of this statute is to expedite the administration and settlement of estates. The language is positive and explicit, and the section must be enforced in accordance with the plain meaning of its terms. Batts v. Batts, 198 N.C. 395, 151 S.E. 868; Morrisey v. Hill, 142 N.C. 355, 55 S.E. 193.

The court…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hoyt v. . BonnettNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  2. Donnally v. Montgomery County Welfare BoardCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. Swartzberg v. Reserve Life Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  4. Morrisey v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Batts v. . BattsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API