Legal Opinion

Batts v. . Batts

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 26, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCoNNOB, J.

Defendant’s plea that this action is barred by tbe provisions of C. S., 100, was properly sustained.

The claim on which the action was brought was presented to the defendant, as the executor of Zilphia E. Batts, deceased, on 1 October, 1927. Plaintiff was promptly notified by defendant, in writing, that the claim was rejected. The claim was not thereupon referred in accordance with the provisions of O. S., 99. This action was not commenced within six months after plaintiff was notified, in writing, that his claim had been rejected. Upon these agreed facts, the plaintiff is barred from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bowen v. . DaughertySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. G. D. Ray & Son Ex Rel. Young v. HoneycuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  3. Morrisey v. Hill.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Truax v. EllettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1944
  2. Presbyterian Hospital v. McCarthaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984
  3. Rutherford v. HarbisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API