Legal Opinion

Vogel v. Ensor

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 9, 1921No. 10,864PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Warrick Circuit Court; Marshall B. Tweedy, Judge. Action by Charles B. Vogel and others against James H. Ensor. From a judgment for defendant, the plaintiffs appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtEnloe, C. J.

The complaint in this case was in two paragraphs, to each of which a demurrer interposed by appellee for want of facts was sustained, and the appellants,. refusing to plead further, suffered a judgment to be rendered against them for costs; from which this appeal is prosecuted. The errors assigned challenge the action of the “court in sustaining said demurrers.

The first paragraph of the complaint was based upon a certain instrument in writing, which purported to be a real estate broker’s contract. That part of said instrument material to the decision of this case read as follows: “Provided…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Zimmerman v. ZehendnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Lee v. HillsIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Stodalka v. NovotnyIllinois Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Mead v. WhiteWashington Supreme Court · 1909

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Schoettle v. Sarkes Tarzian, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API