Legal Opinion
Mead v. White
Washington Supreme Court
Decided June 22, 1909No. 8020PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Pierce county, Clifford, J., entered December 2, 1908, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action on contract.
1Opinion of the CourtGose, J.
The appellants commenced this action for the purpose of reforming a written contract, and recovering a judgment thereon against the defendant and the respondents for its breach. The introductory part of the contract is as follows:
“Building Contract.
“This agreement made and entered into this 25th day of March, 1907, by and between J. R. Winslow, party of the first part, hereinafter designated the contractor, and George H, Mead and Helen M. Mead, party of the second part, hereafter designated the owner.
“Witnesseth: That the contractor, in consideration of the *639agreements herein made by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Glass v. HulbertMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Nugent v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1886
- Board of Commissioners v. ShipleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Grant v. NaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1808
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Craswell v. BiggsOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Standard Acc. Ins. Co. v. SimpsonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
- Chapman v. MillikenWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Smith v. TwohyWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- McCrea v. OgdenWashington Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.