Legal Opinion
In Re Rhoads Industries, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided January 12, 1994No. 17-14707PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER OVERRULING MOTION TO EXTEND TIME FOR FILING NOTICE OF APPEAL
WALTER J. KRASNIEWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Blake and Thora Wendt’s (the “Wendts”) motion to extend time for filing a notice of appeal under Rule 8002(c). The Court finds that the Wendts’ motion is not well taken and should be overruled.
FACTS
In an opinion and order dated December 17, 1993, 162 B.R. 485, this Court granted Rhoads Industries, Inc.’s (“Rhoads”) motion to enforce a settlement agreement between Rhoads and the Wendts.
On January 5, 1994, the Wendts filed a motion to extend…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re HARLOW FAY, INC., Debtor. HARLOW FAY, INC., Appellant, v. FEDERAL LAND BANK OF ST. LOUIS, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993
- Huennekens v. Marx (In Re Springfield Contracting Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
- In Re MowersUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. New York · 1993
- Harlow Fay, Inc. v. Federal Land Bank of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors of Investors & Lenders, Ltd. v. Field (In Re Investors & Lenders, Ltd.)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 1994
- In Re Nickels Performance Systems, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1994