Legal Opinion

Tate v. City of Greenville

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided January 24, 1956No. 17107PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

G. Badger Baker, Acting Associate Justice.

The plaintiff, now appellant, brought this action against respondent, City of Greenville, for damages resulting to his truck when it collided with an overhanging limb of a tree, as the truck was being driven in a westerly direction, by appellant’s employee, on Arlington Street, during May of 1954, between 11 o’clock a. m. and the noon hour.

At the conclusion of appellant’s testimony the trial Judge, upon motion of respondent, directed an involuntary nonsuit upon the ground that appellant’s damages were brought about by his driver’s own negligence and…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Inabinett v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941
  2. Bunton v. South Carolina State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938
  3. Terrell v. City of OrangeburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1935
  4. Humphries v. Union & Glenn Springs R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1909
  5. Heath v. Town of DarlingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert Neff & Sons, Inc. v. City of LancasterOhio Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  3. Parish v. PittsSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API