Legal Opinion

Terrell v. City of Orangeburg

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided June 4, 1935No. 14077PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Baker.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining demurrer to complaint of plaintiff-appellant, on the ground that it does not state a cause of action. The complaint contains 15 paragraphs; but briefly, the material allegations therein contained are as follows:

The defendant is a municipal corporation. It keeps and maintains a water plant to supply its needs and that of citizens. On April 12, 1933, it had several of its employees watering shrubbery and washing and cleaning out a large pool and fountain in a small park located in the heart of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Reeves v. City of EasleySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1932
  2. Triplett v. City of CoulumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1918
  3. Ancrum v. State Highway DepartmentSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1931
  4. Caston v. City of Rock HillSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917
  5. Heath v. Town of DarlingtonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. McCall v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  2. McCall ex rel. Andrews v. BatsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1985
  3. Vaughan v. Town of LymanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
  4. Abernathy v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948
  5. Bruce v. City of SpartanburgSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API