Legal Opinion

Continental Insurance v. Seppala & Aho Construction Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided May 11, 1981No. 79-446PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBois, J.

The defendant purchased a workmen’s compensation policy from the plaintiff Continental Insurance Co.’s agent allegedly based upon the representation that only New Hampshire rates would apply although the area of exposure under the policy included New Hampshire and Massachusetts. We are asked to decide whether the policy allowed the plaintiff to retrospectively apply Massachusetts rates at the termination of the policy coverage period to that percentage of the defendant’s employees who had worked in Massachusetts during the coverage period. The defendant argues on appeal that the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Trombly v. Blue Cross/Blue ShieldSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
  2. Olszak v. Peerless InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
  3. Storms v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1978
  4. Spectrum Enterprises, Inc. v. Helm Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1974
  5. Davison v. ParksSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1919

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Tsadilas v. Providian National BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. Robbins Auto Parts, Inc. v. Granite State InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
  3. Ragan v. AT & T CORP.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  4. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Company, Appellant/cross-Appellee v. Pro-Football, Inc., D/B/A Washington Redskins, Appellee/cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
  5. Merchants Insurance Group v. WarcholSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API