Legal Opinion

White v. State

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 30, 1976No. 45944PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant appeals from a denial of his petition for postcon-viction relief. We affirm.

The facts of this ease are stated in State v. White, 300 Minn. 99, 219 N. W. 2d 89 (1974), the opinion disposing of defendant’s direct appeal. Defendant entered a supermarket and attempted to cash a forged check using false and unlawful identification. Defendant was charged separately with displaying unlawful identification, a city ordinance violation, and aggravated forgery-uttering, a violation of Minn. St. 609.625, subds. 1(1) and 3. After pleading guilty to the ordinance violation in municipal court,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Menna v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  3. United States v. Joseph Ward EasterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. State v. WaldronSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
  5. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1974

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Opsahl v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. GasslerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993
  3. State v. VangSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2014
  4. State v. RaceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  5. State v. ElingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API